The perils of trying to optimize your morality

This story was originally published in The Highlight, Vox’s member-exclusive magazine. To get early access to member-exclusive stories every month, join the Vox Membership program today. I am a recovering optimizer.  Over the past several years, I’ve spent ag…
Sean Dickens · 13 days ago · 2 minutes read


Moral Optimization: A Paradox of Modern Living

The Rise of Moral Optimization

Optimization has become an obsession in modern society. From physical fitness to mental performance, we seek to extract maximum value from every aspect of our lives. This pursuit has now extended to the realm of morality.

Influenced by effective altruism, utilitarianism, and technological advancements, people strive to make the most moral choices by relying on data, reason, and ethical frameworks.

The Pitfalls of Moral Optimization

While the desire for optimal morality is understandable, it paradoxically undermines its very essence.

Moral Subjectivity: Optimization assumes a single, objective morality that can be quantified and maximized. However, moral values are often subjective, context-dependent, and contested, making it impossible to reach absolute moral consensus.

Dilution of Integrity: Optimization can lead to a feeling of internal conflict. When we rigidly adhere to external moral frameworks, we may overlook the specific commitments and responsibilities that define us as individuals, resulting in a loss of integrity.

Embrace Humanism: The Way Forward

Instead of seeking moral perfection through optimization, it is crucial to embrace humanism. This approach recognizes that:

Understanding Moral Choices: It is not always possible to compare moral choices directly, as they may involve incommensurable values. Humanism acknowledges that there can be multiple "good" options, and it encourages satisficing \u2014 choosing an acceptable middle ground.

Acknowledging Imperfection: Optimization breeds a fear of mistakes and vulnerabilities. Humanism encourages us to accept that we are not perfect and that we can strive for good actions even without achieving an ideal state.

The Role of Emotions in Morality

Emotions, often seen as a threat to rational decision-making, are integral to morality.

Empathy and Compassion: Emotions like empathy and compassion motivate us to understand the suffering of others and to act in a caring way. Striving to be emotionless like a robot undermines our ability to connect with others.

Embracing the Value of Subjectivity

Instead of demanding perfection, humanism embraces the richness of diverse perspectives on morality.

Ethical Pluralism: While there is a need for some moral guideposts, it is important to recognize that there is no universal moral code that applies to everyone in all situations.

Ongoing Dialogue: Moral understanding is not static. It evolves through dialogue, debate, and the sharing of different viewpoints.

By embracing humanism, we can overcome the pitfalls of moral optimization and create a more compassionate, inclusive, and human-centered world.